Talk: Weedle McHairybug

Please do not add nonsense to Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the Jundland Wastes sandbox. Thank you. CC7567 07:55, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Your name is cool. Just thought you should know. :) Chack Jadson 00:19, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

• While we appreciate additions to stub articles, your summary for Shadows of the Empire 1 is one wall of text. Please break it up into manageable paragraphs. Thanks. OLIOSTER 08:14, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits to the Battle of Endor page. Since I'm trying to bring it to featured status, it would be great if you could continue.--ID-21 Dolphin 18:49, September 6, 2010 (UTC)--You can't disguise yourself from me...Jedi. 18:48, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

When editing and creating articles, please remember to follow all site policies. Continued failure to do so may result in a block from editing. Thank you for your cooperation. Grand Moff Tranner 01:49, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

• I advise you to read up on the multiple site policies listed in your welcome message, so that you may better understand the issues here. Grand Moff Tranner 02:01, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to point out that lack of sources in other articles isn't an excuse to do unsourced additions now, as you suggested in Sub-Adult Group. –Tm_T 14:57, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

It's a little from column A and a little from column B. He cared very much about power, and was furiously jealous of anyone with more of it than him. However, he was so unjustifiably arrogant that he thought he was a much bigger player in the political world than he really was. Basically, he thought he was the sh*t, an didn't need more power because he had it all already. Jayden Matthews 14:28, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Hello there, I see you have been making articles dedicated to video games. If it interests you, we have an entire project on the subject. Corellian Premier 16:44, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, good catch regarding the number of ATTs for First Battle of Theed, but could you re-add ATTs to the infobox, because they were there? And you could definitely source that to Episode I. See here for more information. Thanks! Corellian Premier 18:53, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Weedle, I just finished reading Darth Plaugeis, and I noticed the edits you made on Anakin Skywalker's possible father. Where does it say that Plaugeis tried, and the midi-chlorian's refused, creating Skywalker in retaliation? I must have missed something. Can you tell me what pages to review. Thanks!!!24.90.125.6 22:41, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

• Woah,..really. So plagueis didn't and Vader the Ultimate guide did? I read that, i thought it was just a book on the merchandise and legacy darth vader left in the real world. Please tell me what pages, so I can check it out on Barnes and Nobles tommorrow.24.90.125.6 00:46, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

While your edit is appreciated, the page you just edited currently has a template called {{Inuse}} at the top. This template means that someone is currently working on improving the article, and to avoid edit conflicts, no one other than the placer of the template should edit the page while the message is visible. Thank you for your cooperation. JangFett 13:51, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

OK then. That works for me. Just be careful with adding mentions of impliactions to articles. It has to be really blatent, like that one was. NaruHina 16:03, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Anything you can think of to make that Legacy section better would be great.... I kind of banged out a couple paragraphs because I thought it was important, but couldn't figure out how to write it without going on at excessive length about the entire EU. Another pair of eyes helps =) – DigiFluid 01:05, April 12, 2012 (UTC)

There is no evidence given in the sources that you have cited (that I could find) to support your edit. The issue here is not about if "Palpatine clearly was goading Marek into finishing him off, with Kota telling him not to as he'll be 'back where he started'" but that you wrote how Palpatine was "more than willing to allow himself to be struck down and potentially be killed." Please refrain from trying to insert extrapolations in articles that are a result of personal opinion or private conclusion. It is indeed considered original research under the definition outlined in the Attribution—that is, inclusiveness is based on whether the material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. TFU does not specifically state the motive for Palpatine's use of Dun Möch, nor does it state that he was willing to let himself be destroyed. The burden of evidence lies with you. What this means is that you will need to post the direct quote from the cited material that supports your statement of Palpatine's to the article talk page. Merely citing TFU as your source does not legitimize your edit. —Gethralkin 02:01, April 13, 2012 (UTC)

die for what he's done to me.

back where you started.

• Please see response on the talk page. —Gethralkin 03:46, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Your problem seems to be with specifying a correct source for the image, which is the most important field when uploading an image. As long as you choose a reasonably relevant license tag, that can always be altered later if need be, as long as the image is properly sourced. Feel free to ask the administrator who is deleting your images what exactly you're doing wrong. They will more than likely be willing to give you a heads up as to how you can correct whatever mistake you're making. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:03, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Hello there, just reminding you to watch your copy/pastes. Rebel Fortress needs a bit of work. Also, the layout guide specifies all articles need categories: for instance, [[Category:Structures]]. If you have any other questions, feel free to let me know, and happy editing! Corellian Premier 00:13, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

• And feel free to remove said tags once completed. Also, for what its worth, all the images in the strat guide are in black-and-white and rather tiny. Corellian Premier 02:07, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

I did upload File:3JediTemples.jpg early on, thinking that maybe I'd create a generic Jedi temple article. The problem came with what to name it. It's not the Jedi Temple, but a Jedi temple. Anyway, maybe you can use that. Enochf 02:32, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

Hey there! I noticed that you added The Phantom Menace to Gooberfish's "Sources" section. Please take a moment to note the difference between an "Appearance" and a "Source." One cannot be both. Cheers. Menkooroo 03:00, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

This is just a reminder to please remember to categorize your articles. Thanks. Trak Nar 06:48, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, your assumption on the canonicity of images from that site is wrong. The only canon images are the ones included in Warfare. That includes a front only shot that doesn't show the engines, and a shot that shows that the engines number at least 19 according to this edit. Any other information gleaned from that site is not official until explicitly referenced in an official release. While this may eventually come, it has not yet, so please do not assume that just because it is shown on Mr Hsiao's site that it is canon in regards to the ship designs since any future artist/author may change the details. - Cavalier One 18:26, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Despite it's apparent use in the Piett/Ozzel image, Mr Hsaio's image is not canon and should not be uploaded to illustrate articles in itself. It may be uploaded if it is serving a purpose to illustrate behind the scenes information, but at the moment I do not see where this would be possible. Images should not be shoehorned into the site simply because they are available. As for the Piett/Ozzel image, I am afraid I am not prepared to ruin my copy of the book just to scan the image. There are several other users on the site that are uploading such images from Warfare, so contacting them and requesting the upload would be the best course of action. - Cavalier One 10:38, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, if you want a page to be deleted, place {{Delete<reason>}} at the top of the page rather than blanking it. I've already tagged the Imperial Science Corps article you blanked, so just remember to use the tag in the future. Cheers, nayayen★talk 13:07, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

You can not completely rely on Word's auto check. I noted redundant use of words in the same sentence—"the background of a fleet maneuver... depicted several TIE Advanced X1s in the background."—and "artwork" should not be preceded by "an" since it is more commonly (and therefore American English standard policy of WP) used as a plural instance. Be careful to examine your grammar and if someone points something out to you, please seek out input from an authoritative source rather than relying on an automated piece of software. Thanks. —Gethralkin 16:05, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

• Just wanted to reemphasize that proper English grammar is policy here on the Wookieepedia. If you are planning on making significant edits, I recommend that you run them by one of the tutors at the Online Writing Lab before posting them in an article. Otherwise, you are leaving a mess for others to clean up. —Gethralkin 06:40, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
• Good work on the last Anakin edit you did. Just a small note concerning the way dashes are inserted—"the proper way to make a dash in a sentence is to use an em dash (by typing "&mdash;") not surrounded by spaces" (italics mine). Good work finding and posting that canon WWII reference. —Gethralkin 04:52, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, Weedle, do you want to join WookieeProject Warfare? We'd love to have you! Just sign your name with a number sign and three tildes in the participants section. Thanks! Cade Calrayn 14:34, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

• Book of Sith, last chapter: Rule of One. His apprentices were apprentices for life—they were never meant to replace him, just run some errands for him. That's what "there is no way but my way" means, it means "I follow no rules but the rule that says that I am the boss, forever" (Rule of One). --R5-X41238-G8-R3-3124-D2 13:28, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

As per Jason Fry's comment here regarding the canonicity of Ansel Hsiao's designs, please do not add information gleaned directly from Hsiao's site unless it has been referred to explicitly in an official source. To quote: Re Ansel's designs, what I included in the endnotes is the canonical stuff. Nothing else is so defined. Please do not continue to add non-official material to these articles. Thank you for your cooperation. - Cavalier One 08:05, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

I removed the statement because of this section in the MOS. <-Omicron 15:02, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Would you mind sourcing your additions to Showdown on Coruscant, please? I try to keep it as close to status as I can on my own, but I have no idea where you got your information from. NaruHina 05:33, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for adding, either way. NaruHina 05:39, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

• Please categorize any images you upload. Thanks. OLIOSTER 23:22, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

• I'll get to the other ones in due time but feel free to contribute any way you see fit. I am only one man and SWG has so many paintings (and other things) in it so I welcome any help. I'll just come along and fix any problems I see. Feel free to use any of the painting articles I've made as a template for future ones. OLIOSTER 22:29, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

Was the review you read from an official Star Wars affiliate and do you have a link to it. Since no one else is going to be able to find the specific review you mean independently, that needs a reference in the article. NaruHina 00:46, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

• Well, if IGN counts as an official Star Wars affiliate, here it is: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/05/24/star-wars-darth-vader-and-the-ghost-prison-1-reviewWeedle McHairybug 01:07, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Weedle. Great job on the Galactic Battleground articles. When uploading images, remember to remove the watermark and other information written around it, since that is OOU. Cheers. Stake black 00:44, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks. I had to take a lot of time trying to search for those images on the web, and let's put it this way, heavengames.com was a treasure trove of these images. I sourced them under Galactic Battlegrounds because that's where they came from. Hope that's all right. BTW, I took two computer science courses in College and passed with a C average. However, I haven't been able to find my textbook/lab CD in my house, so I might have to ask, as I usually need to consult my textbooks to figure things out: How do I try to remove watermarks and other information? Weedle McHairybug () 00:52, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Hey there, when you're adding source lists to Galactic Battlegrounds, remember that the strategy guide actually came out first, so the guide gets {{1stm}} and the game gets {{1st}}. Corellian Premier 02:39, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I undid the edit because it was unsourced and I wasn't sure if it was speculation. The thing is, the Executors a Featured Article, and any additions should really be taken to the nominator/writer—who in this case is Toprawa and Ralltiir. FAs have to pass regular FA Reviews, and the original author has to be the one to satisfy the reviewers' objections, if I'm not mistaken. I'd take your additions to him and see what he thinks. You definitely needs sources, though. Cade Calrayn 16:52, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Here are the image sources: They came from the Empire Strikes Back Sketchbook and TheForce.net

Weedle McHairybug () 17:04, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

When creating or editing articles, please recall that all articles should be properly categorized, and that all in-universe articles should be written in the past tense. Thank you for your cooperation. Grand Moff Tranner 15:45, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

I don't actualy have the Far Orbit Project, so I can't expand. In creating the article I pretty much just used the scant info from Warfare. Most things relating to that are pretty bare though, including the Capture, and I think Far Orbit Project related material needs a lot of work done on them. 501st 17:25, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. --R5-X41238-G8-R3-3124-D2 13:30, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

hello friend, help me please, is a question I want to do, in the version of force unleashed for ps2, wii and psp, what is the name of the weapon that imperial jumptroopers and imperial officers use...HELP!!!!

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia. However, when creating new articles, please be sure to add categories. Thank you for your cooperation.—Cal Jedi 19:57, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

• Also, please be sure to properly format the Sources section as I did here.—Cal Jedi 20:05, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

Hello there. Well, I shall create the actual article as soon as I am satisfied with my draft. I intend to do something status-wise with this article—at least a Good Article, perhaps even a Featured Article. Were you interested in something about it? :) --LelalMekha (talk) 01:06, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

• All right. If you have any advice/opinion about the article, just let me know! ;-) I like to hear from everybody, especially since English is not my mother tongue. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:16, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

Hello Weedle, in answer to your question about the Scout Trooper tricked by Han, he has not been named to date. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:14, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

• I was ready to say: "Off the top of my head, I have no idea". I do believe, like Hanzo, that he is still unnamed, but I do not think he already has an article. I may want to search in Star Wars: Behind the Magic tomorrow, however. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:18, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

I am currently rewriting his entire article in preparation for the FAN. It could be another week before I take down the inuse tag. JangFett 14:22, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

• The "unlucky" was just apart of a description from Insider 105. Basically it is nothing more than just writer opinion and I could not fit it into the article. JangFett 00:33, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

You've been told before to follow all site policies when creating new articles. This is not a hard thing to do. Further disregard for site policies will result in a block from editing. Thank you for your cooperation. Grand Moff Tranner 15:35, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

I wouldn't dare to say that I'm an expert, but I can be really devoted to searching and extracting a specific information from a bundle of sources. To be honest, I don't feel too comfortable with such policy issues (the Vietnam War) and the likes, especially when it comes to American politics—after all, I'm an old-school European. To me, America is a galaxy far, far away, which is covered extensively by the media. Regardless, if you ask, I can look for this information in the sources I possess—even though it doesn't ring a bell at the moment—but I hope this won't bring me into partisan issues. --LelalMekha (talk) 00:01, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Weedle: Please be more careful in the future. You created this article with no sources. You also need to be sure that you're writing in the past tense for In-Universe articles. You've been warned repeatedly for your lack of proper formatting and details in articles. Please be sure to be more careful in the future. Failure to do so could result in a block.—Cal Jedi 01:58, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

• Also, Cal may not agree with me on this, but I'd prefer if you left the redlinks to someone who has access to the comics in question. My personal reasoning behind leaving those redlinks in the timeline was so that users who are knowledgeable about those sources and have access to them can create detailed articles for the events in question. When someone creates a redlink just to fill it in, it causes the article in question to sink below the surface of the Wook and results in the articles often being ignored. Redlinks are spotlights pointing users to places they can add their knowledge, and creating them with the bare minimum of info takes the focus off the redlinks and often hurts the new articles. CadeCalrayn 02:33, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I was forgetting to chop off "starwars.com" from the beginning of the url in the template, so it was liking to "starwars.com/starwars.com". NaruHina 12:59, August 6, 2012 (UTC)

• Well, it's a start, but it's still going to a dead link on the backup link, even with the dropping of starwars.com. Similar problems exist with the Star Wars Galaxies archive links. Weedle McHairybug () 13:01, August 6, 2012 (UTC)

How could Stass Allie command in the battle of coruscant if she DIED before if happened? She dies in Clone Wars Season 5 episode 1 IT'S CONFIRMED that she didn't fight in the battle of coruscant. If you don't believe me then search it up and watch the show thank you. Best Regards --Edak Trebmil (talk) 15:51, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

It is a command center. As numerous factions had such buildings, I'm not sure if each needs an individual article. Each one pretty much does the same for each faction. Other buildings such as fortresses have special features for each faction, so I'd say they could warrant individual articles. I'm talking to admin right now about how we should best handle this. MasterFred 20:14, November 21, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Weedle. I don't know if you're still researching this field, but I found this while skimming through Star Wars: Behind the Magic: Lucas first became intrigued with the idea of a primitive tribe battling the technologically advanced Imperials while developing the Vietnam film Apocalypse Now. When he later decided to puruse Star Wars, he continued to be fascinated by this theme. Therefore, first the Wookiees and later the Ewoks were conceived as primitive warriors who ultimately triumph over a well-armed enemy. Lucas also maintains that there are inentional parallels between the Ewoks ant the Viet Cong, and the Galactic Emperor and Richard Nixon.

This is from 1998, and that's the earliest source I could find—although there must be older ones. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:21, December 1, 2012 (UTC)

That's cool. Keep in mind, though, that statements based on an author saying things like " I imagined that..." aren't canon. They can be noted in "Behind the scenes" as authorial intent, but that's about it. Menkooroo (talk) 13:30, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Weedle. Thanks for the cleanup on Imperial Garrison Base. Are you sure we could pinpoint it's destruction at 0 ABY, though? I haven't read Tatooine Sojourn yet (I'm trying to find it online), but from what I inferred from the article, the base was destroyed some time after, without specifying when. Pinpointing dates this precisely seems like a strech, given that Tatooine Sojourn's article puts its events at circa 0 ABY, and Galactic Spy doesn't have a cohesive story or timeline (spanning from eps. I to IV). Stake black 16:27, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

I was working on it, but then I got sidetracked by Marvel comics updates (and while the post-RotJ Marvel articles are exemplary, the ones prior to that are lacking). I will get back to it. It is hard to work with limited sources that engage the subject matter but in summary, because one is forced to seek middle ground between copying the text (which is, of course, an act of plagiarism) and being lax with it, which is the bane of countless articles in this website (the second choice is frankly far worse than plagiarism, because Star Wars authors use Wookieepedia as a source, and a mistake may find itself in print).--R5-X41238-G8-R3-3124-D2 (talk) 00:16, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I wanna wish you a happy new year! :) --XXLVenom998 (talk) 11:00, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

I deleted the article because it was poorly-written speculation (and borderline fanon) that appears to be based on something from a future episode of The Clone Wars series. Grand Moff Tranner 00:31, January 10, 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to mention that I noticed you working on adding Star Tours flights from the flight status boards, I assume. I'm actually putting together a list of those flghts, times, etc, and intend to create articles for them. As an aside, I've noticed that most flights labeled "LANDED," "ON APPROACH," and "BOARDING" on those lists consistently have a time around 0800, suggesting that the Star Tours 2 flight takes place around 8:00 in the morning. :) --JMM (talk) 13:28, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

Hey Weedle. I saw that you added a sentence to the Great Temple's article: "At some point, the Star Tours security check-in droid G2-9T heard of the base, and accidentially let slip of its existence before stopping himself." Do you have the exact quote? That would be interesting: since the Great Temple was only recovered by the Alliance in 1 BBY, that would mean that the events of "Star Tours II" happen between 1 and 0 BBY. --LelalMekha (talk) 22:11, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that Hoth/Tina story. As far as the rest of the translation is concerned, I've made major progress yesterday before I went to bed; I successfully assigned meaning to all the writing in katakana, which should aloow my friend to read them in context. You can well imagine that, if you weren't a Star Wars fan, you wouldn't understand a word such as Alderaan in a text. Same goes for a Japanese speaker, who would not recognize アルデラーン (Aruderaan) unless he were told what it is. My friend and I won't start working again on it until tonight, but I can tell you that the goggle-eyed creature in the bottom right is called a... possum. --LelalMekha (talk) 09:55, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

The reason is that infoboxes are not for speculation. No verified source has stated those GrS dates so it is pure speculation on the user's behalf. If you feel strongly you could place it in the behind the scenes or on the talk page. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:39, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

• Ultimately if a user has a problem with my edits they can address me directly. I'm not pushing for any particular user to be banned as you seem to imply. I simply removed unverified speculation from an infobox. I'm not going to go instigating arguments with other users because you yourself have an issue with my edits. Thankyou. Rokkur Shen (talk) 13:00, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the elephant-thing remains a complete mystery to both my friend and I. Its name seem to be somehting like "eresupaddo", but beyond that, we cannot tell. If it's meant to be a transription of a foreign loan word—as the use of katakana syllabary suggests—we have absolutely no idea which word it would be. We're currently planning to translate whole pages of the manual (pages 2-3, 6-7 and 18-19), but we won't be able to do it too soon, since my friend is currently in exam session. --LelalMekha (talk) 13:12, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

The quote is from Jedi vs Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force -- from Palpatine's holocron. As my copy of the book is in a different country right now, I cannot check, but the Preview function of the Amazon website (which is a scholarly tool in all but name) confirms that the quote appears in page 178. I believe I added it to the Palpatine article at some point. Or maybe some other article, I can't recall. --R5-X41238-G8-R3-3124-D2 (talk) 22:44, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

Hey Weedle, additions such as the one you've just made need to be cited in the article otherwise they could be construed as fanon and removed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 13:08, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

Thankyou, you also need to cite your addition to Palpatine's lightsabers. You may want to refresh yourself/review the Wookieepedia:Layout Guide on how to appropriately add information to pages and use citations/references. Rokkur Shen (talk) 13:15, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

• The edit you specifically made about the one lightsaber. You need to cite everything you add. If the trivia gallery mentioned it then a citation needs to be added within the article. Explaining an edit in the edit summary is encouraged, however it is not sufficient to justify what you've added. Rokkur Shen (talk) 13:21, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

Weedle, please see WP:TRIVIA before inserting information in TCW episode behind the scenes sections. Thank you, JangFett 22:56, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, any information from someone official could work, but it would be better to know what that project is. JangFett 23:22, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

Want to prevent future illogical and unexplained reverts to your edits? Then vote here: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights Every user should be aware of this page. . 13:01, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

• FYI, the above remark is spam that the user with the numerical IP address, 66.232.118.195, posted in several editors' Talk pages. The user attempted to hide identifiable information by posting with a false signature and timestamp. You'll be happy to know that this has earned him a 3 year ban of his IP by Grunny, including having his account creation disabled and his e-mail blocked. I have struck the invalid signature and timestamp above and marked the user's comment as {{unsigned}} so that it accurately shows correct information. —Gethralkin 02:24, June 6, 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry that I did not reply sooner to you. I am a Japanese, but not a gamer. I have not played those games. Therefore, I think that I cannot become your help. Please understand. Z-sword (talk) 13:33, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

As I mentioned in my edit summary in Dyer, I'll make a note in the bts. Simply stating (apparent) in the infobox won't work. Thanks for the input. JangFett 03:25, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

I went to the TDL and enjoyed the Star Tours 2 a few days ago. But I'm sorry that I didn't watch the message screen very carefully. In the youtube, I can read some Japanese letters including "Droid Claim' and "Baby Center". The other small and low quality letters.... I can't read them, either. In next oppotunity to go the TDL, I will note the infomations. Please wait. Z-sword (talk) 16:38, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Timely, Endorexpress.net uploaded the old images of the Start Tours Tokyo booklet. The informations that the poster said was completely equivalent to those images. Z-sword (talk) 15:26, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

What's Edge of the Galaxy? Sorry, I cannot understand the last message. Dan Android's tourscan didn't mention about the location of Praya and Bar-Neth. Z-sword (talk) 14:56, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Hi

I got all info in the Spaceport THX1138 video. Italic parts are originally in Japanese. XX:YY is the time of the video. Z-sword (talk) 16:25, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

00:33 BAGGAGE CLAIM - LEVEL A

• NOUTH WING
• SOUTH WING
• CORE PLANETS
• OUTER RIM
• OVERFLOW CLAIM
• LIFT TUBE ACCESS

00:42 DROID CLAIM - LEVEL B

• DROID REGISTRY
• RESTRAINING BOLT REMOVAL
• RESTRAINING BOLT SALES
• DROID ASSEMBLY
• COLLECTION
• DROID REPAIR
• PA DROID SCANNING

00:51 DROID CUSTOMS - LEVEL C

• CERTIFICATION
• MEMORY BACKUP
• MEMORY WIPE STATION
• INSPECTION 1 SCAN
• DROID REGISTRY
• CERTIFICATION

00:56 CLINIC & BABY CENTER - LEVEL D

• BACTA TANKS
• DOCTORS STATION
• APUATIC NEWBORNS
• PRESONAL ASSISTANCE DROIDS
• MEDICAL/SURGISAL DROIDS
• INCUBATION PODS

01:03 DUTY RREE - LEVEL C

• POWER CONVERTERS
• BACTA SURPLUS
• OUTER RIM SOUVENIRS
• RWH DROID SURPLUS
• HOLO RECORDERS

01:20 THE NEBULA TRILLION PARSEC CLUB - LEVEL G

LOUNGES FOR EXPERT SPACERS

• CAPTAINS CORNER
• SABAAC TABLES
• CLUB KESSEL
• PRIORITY LIFT TUBES
• OFFCER'S ROUBGE
• MEMBERSHIP SERVICES

01:29 STARGAZER GRILL RESTAURANT - LEVEL F

YOU CAN ENJOY DISHES BEING SURROUNDED BY STARS.

• AGAMAR SLIDERS
• ENDORIAN CHICKEN
• BLUE MILK
• CALAMARIA SURPRISE
• NERFSTEAK
• ROAST GALMA
• LAMBRO SHARK
• BERBERSIAN CRAB

01:38 MUNILIST CREDIT EXCHANGE - LEVEL C

YOU CAN EXCHANGE THE CREDITS OF ALL PLANETS.

• REPUBLIC CREDITS
• CORELLIAN CREDITS
• ADUMARI CREDCOINS
• AURODIUM COINS
• IMPERIALCREDITS
• CREDIT VOUCHERS

01:48 OUTER RIM RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE - LEVEL A

WE CAN PROVIDE MEALS AND DRINKS FOR ALL KINDS OF BEING.

• HIVE CANTINA
• MANDALORIAN KRI'GEE
• GARRMORL
• TWIN SUNS SPECIAL
• ITHORIAN BRANDY
• KEELA
• POLAR WATER

01:55 AIR TO GROUND TRANSPORTATION - LEVEL B

YOU MUST USE PUBLIC TRANSPORTS TO GO TO THE SURFACE.

• SSP FREIGHTERS
• LINE-OPERATED SHUTTLES
• INDEPENDENT STAR CRUISERS
• PERSONAL SHUTTLES
• CEC CLASS TRANSPORTS

• PART A: The Mon Cal is Meena Tills. (1:09)
• PART B: The Ishi Tib is Gume Saam, and the Hutt is Jabba. (2:32)

Hi

I give you two of new infomations. Use them as necessary.

In the entrance hall, the Starpeeder 1000 video has some detail infomations written by Aurebesh. It is very difficult to watch them in youtube. I translated them. See it.

There are two RX pilot droids in TDL. One is hitch-hiking and another is talking some old-version's quotes. Their container boxes have seals with the name of each droids. According to them, hitch-hiking RX is HHG-RX(Hitch HikinG RX!) and old-quote RX is RX-23. Sorry, it was too dark and difficult to shot photos. Z-sword (talk) 15:33, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

additional information.

I found the container box stickers' images. See it. (It is not my shot.) I think you can read RX-23, HHG-RX, and IM-2M. IM-2M is a IM-series droid. There is only one real IM-series droid in the TDL's queue. Probably that is IM-2M. Z-sword (talk) 16:12, May 27, 2013 (UTC)

Hey. I did intend to work on these other articles one day or another, but why exactly do we need to "do it soon"? --LelalMekha (talk) 19:06, May 27, 2013 (UTC)

Hey Weedle, what are the differences between Star Wars: Legacy Book 1 and Star Wars: Legacy Volume 1 (Hardcover)? They both have the same source link in the external link section. JangFett 18:20, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Things go by different names sometimes on this wiki, and some pages like List of comics, never see the light of an update. However, Dark Horse calls it Star Wars: Legacy Book 1 and the Dark Horse release is June 5. The June 12 is just when bookstores receive it. Sorry for the lack of communication.Darth Pickle 2 (talk) 19:50, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

• Before I do anything, are we sure that they are the same and the List of comics had an error? If so, then I'll delete the Hardcover article with the CSD tag. JangFett 22:47, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I actually wasn't really heading in that direction, but because it was related to another article that I was editing and I happened to notice the really bad incongruities, I felt I had to do something. Then I found out that it wasn't the only article and I had to go over several others to get them to agree with the sources:

Plus, I have had to resort to investigating every single source and linked article in order to dig up useful information. For example, the only reference that MPLT-2a units appear in Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption is in its own article under the listed Appearances. No mention of them in EaW:FoC article, so I tracked it down to an image showing a couple of MPLT-2a under attack from a couple of TIE Lancets on the Proton beam cannon page. TIE Lancets only appear in Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption, so since MPLT-2a are only referenced as being in the game in its own article—without a sourced Bts note—I now had visual evidence to add MPLT-2a to the list in the EaW:FoC article. I have never played Star Wars: Empire at War, Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds (or any of their expansions), so it's a lot of research trying to nail something down. As far as what was used to hit Blizzard 1, I have no idea, sorry. —Gethralkin 08:16, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

You can write out the information into paragraphs, but yea, that is a bit of work. The pages haven't lost anything by the lists being deleted, because all of the information from the list is in the categories at the bottom of the page, but is cluttering the article itself. Trip391 (talk) 21:36, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, good call on the re-shuffling of the MyComyc series in Threepio's article. I initially reverted your edit and then realized my mistake before spending two or three edits fixing it! :D I think that the last five comics can now all comfortably fit after the Mungo arc, with the Fromm Gang canonically released from Jabba and Broom being inspired by the Heep. What do you think? Menkooroo (talk) 01:24, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

I'm a little confused by this: In addition, Bast, due to witnessing how Vader dealt with foolish officers who made the mistake of assuming the latter to be subservient to Tarkin, always showed his respect. What's the latter referring to and is the foolish officer Motti? Does the source actually say "foolish?" Any clarification would be great since I'm going to reword this a little. Also, is there any information about Cassio Tagge? Thanks, Weedle. JangFett 15:21, July 13, 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for clarifying. :) JangFett 18:09, July 13, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, first of all, thank you for all the help on my pages. I'm not much of a wordsmith myself, so any assist I get is very helpful.

That said, I have a question for you. Should I create pages of Wookiee Villagers and Geonosian Workers and if so, what infoboxes would be the most suitable for them?

PS:In case you missed them, I added pictures to Kaminoan droids and filled those redlinks in the Food processing center. --Za'rath (talk) 16:03, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Do you know the source of the name T3 (Star Tours)? I think the only source is Endorexpress.net. In retro-Tokyo article, however, the old booklet's second image only says that T3 is Passenger Droid. Like the other F-series droids, the passenger droid had name markings in his chest plate. See this image. But none could confirm the letters, because he was always in the telephone box. But... I found a hint of his real name. See this image. This is from one of old TDL StarTours booklets. According to the Lady Droid's text, she is a girlfriend of F-29. I think the passenger dorid's name is not T3 but F-29. What do you think about it? P.S. I found these two images in the twitter of a Japanese disney fan.Z-sword (talk) 15:52, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

• That seems reasonable, especially because he IS the same model as the other F-series. Let me check on it a little more. --JMM (talk) 16:44, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

• Wow, had no idea about that entry in the Encyclopedia. Interesting that he also really isn't a "Passenger Droid" but I suppose he could be going somewhere as a passenger during the time of his appearance in the ride. Also, it actually calls F-25 "F-25-OJS". I noticed that pictures you can see of those droids include those letters on the end of their names. I'd suggest we can add the longer names into the text of the articles, but still keep the titles the shorter names they're better known by. --JMM (talk) 16:15, August 4, 2013 (UTC)

The Lady Droid's description in the EndorExpress.net is a mis-translation. Spot the Droid poster's Japanese text says that she wants to be an actress and goes to the talent school to this end. It don't say that she wants to direct. I edited the article a few months ago, but be re-edited. I am a native Japanese speaker. I am right.

And see the talk page of F-22. F-22's quotes (in Japanese) included some in-universe terms, his favarite night spot Alien Quarter Cantina and the house band Rolling Droids. If they should be added to Wookieepedia, please create the articles. I'm not an English speaker, so don't do well. Z-sword (talk) 17:09, August 4, 2013 (UTC)

I watched the Afterburner video, but it is unoffocial. If what you said is right, don't you find something a little bit wrong or disrespectful in cheering against America in such a senitive matter(if that is the suggestion)?

60.225.195.213 07:05, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

60.225.195.213 09:04, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

60.225.195.213 02:42, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

I don't think the Japanese site is actually an official LFL site. It probably shouldn't be mentioned on the Death Star III pages since it's a fanmade source. --JMM (talk) 11:56, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I know some medals. Like I know the top were Hero of the Soviet Union and Hero of Labor. What is the favor? --Цар (talk) 04:09, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Weedle, please don't do this kind of stuff if you don't have the source and aren't willing to research it. The Mission to Kuat is a conjectural name and the mission was only mentioned in the novel. You're basing your edits on what is on Wookieepedia, and it'd be much better if you left redlinks to people who have the sources so that they can accurately create the article. Thanks. Cade Calrayn 17:22, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Hi Weedle -- I added the President of the United States stuff to Earth (Star Tours), based on the discussion at Forum:SH:Merging "Earth" articles and the previous addition of a non-canon Indiana Jones appearance. I'd merge it with Urthha too, but not everyone seems to agree. —Silly Dan 01:25, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, Star Tours pages from the Disney website seem to be ridiculously difficult to track. For example, I couldn't even access it directly because I'm European, and I was forced to use webarchives to get in! However, the link doesn't lead to the proper place anymore, and I have no clue how to get it back. :-/ --LelalMekha (talk) 10:47, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. I guess that will have to wait until Archive.org ends up updating its archives to include it, if it ever does. I'm probably going to be in-and-out from now until December, since it will be the start of a new semester, and unlike prior semesters, I'm actually living on campus, at least for the actual weekdays when class is in session. Hopefully by Spring Semester 2014, I'm out of College. Weedle McHairybug () 10:52, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

I removed the quote you added to TIE Advanced x1 simply because it isn't in the format that {{Quote}} is used for. Quotes are mainly for dialogues, whereas what you are posting is referred to as a Publisher's comment. Such comments are given a new subheading (Publisher's comment) and italicized and eclosed with quotation marks. The attribution of the excerpt of or the full description is given in a ref tag at the end of the sourced material. Thanks. —Gethralkin 22:14, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

• Oh. Sorry about that. I don't have enough time to do the changes since I have to leave for my college campus's dorm soon, and I'm most likely not going to be making edits to this site or any wiki until after December 17th, so as much as I want to do the changes, I'm not sure whether I have the capability of doing so right now. Plus, I don't know where to find the template for Publisher's comments so I could cut and paste it in there. Weedle McHairybug () 22:18, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to thank you for pointing out that my article was left purposely vague, and not meant to suggest the Vader scene is the "correct" one. I was a little worried people wouldn't quite get that! :) --JMM (talk) 02:04, August 25, 2013 (UTC)

Instead of uploading the pdf file, you can properly cite it to via {{Blog}}. It will be better since you won't wind up with this [2]. JangFett 21:53, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

• Got it. Thanks. Thought uploading it to the site directly would better preserve it in the event that Star Wars.com undergoes one of its purges again. Either way, did what you suggested. Weedle McHairybug () 22:07, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Do you know what this is? I want to make a list of G2-9T's scan luggage items. But I cannot identify it. Please help. Z-sword (talk) 16:34, September 2, 2013 (UTC)

Hello there Weedle. Sorry, but all the evidence was right there in the article to begin with:

• and,

Please check all the sources before splitting articles. All sources combined clearly establish that the grey R2-Q2 are one and the same. The starwars.com article explicitly stated that the R2-Q2 included with The Saga Collection Pack is Biggs' droid. And from the packaging itself I've provided this quote:

"Serves Biggs Darklighter during the Battle of Yavin and may be a double agent." (emphasis added)

Toy-lines and packaging are every bit as canon as the rest of the sources as dictated by Leland Chee. As previously mentioned we simply do not know how he got from aboard the Tantive IV to Yavin or where his true allegiances lie. It is not entirely inconceivable. The colorist of the Empire and Rebellion comics just did not get the colors right. This is evidenced by your newly created R2-Q2 (Biggs Darklighter) article which states that they couldn't even keep his coloration consistent between issues of the two series: Empire and Rebellion. He is the same droid. With this I suggest merging the articles back into R2-Q2. Feel free to append the above reasoning to the talk page if necessary. Bo Shuda (talk) 10:03, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

• There's still no explicit confirmation that they are the same entity. The only thing the archived StarWars.com article stated was that R2-Q2 is the name of his droid. It never stated that it was the same one as the model that was on the Tantive IV. Heck, its partner, R4-M9, had a droid with the same name in Star Tours, yet its colorings made it obvious that it was not intended to be the same droid. As far as the Hasbro article, again, nothing really stated it was the same as the one on the Tantive IV (explicitly, I mean, and as far as I could tell, not even implied, which I'll explain shortly). Yes, the Hasbro article does mention that R2-Q2 (Biggs', I mean) may have been a double agent, but here's the thing, the exact words of the description are that it "may have been a double agent," which means it is assumed to be one in-universe, but never fully confirmed. And besides, as I mentioned earlier with R4-M9, there have been a few droids who, other than sharing the same name, were not intended to be the same droid at all. What you're engaging in is called original research, which isn't allowed. If you want them to be merged, I suggest you get sources that specifically, explicitly state that they are the same droid, not simply give the name of Biggs' droid or briefly imply the possibility of Biggs' droid being a double agent.
• And the Talk page (the one for the Tantive IV R2-Q2, I mean) IS the reason why I even split the article in the first place. The comments dated back to 2006, which by that point they already knew about the description from Hasbro (The Star Wars Archived Page was dated back in 2005, and the Hasbro toy was also released in 2006). You want to complain about it, take it to Admiral J Nebulax and Lord Oblivion, as they are the ones who said they were two different droids in those posts. All I did was heed their request. Weedle McHairybug () 10:54, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
• Well going by your own logic then that would require creating a separate article for the differing coloured r2's from Empire and Rebellion. I think you've taken the comments posted 6 years ago out of proportion. The community left the page as one page for 6 years. It should have stayed that way. Also, please note that Yodapedia and numerous other starwars wiki's also still list the droid as one and the same. That's my opinion anyway. Bo Shuda (talk) 00:47, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
• Also, your argument including R4-M9 is flawed. As they are droids that have differing colours and appear in two completely unrelated media they are clearly different droids. R2-Q2 is an entirely different matter. It is a droid with the same coloration/markings in the same film with sources that imply that it is the same droid. Bo Shuda (talk) 00:56, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah Sorry about that i just clicked the link on the template and it went to that page. Byzantinefire 17:31, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

I would just like to direct you to some of the guidelines I've laid out at WookieeProject Galaxies for making better articles relating to Star Wars Galaxies. Thanks! OLIOSTER 21:21, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

• Wanted to help. Unfortunately, I've never actually been a player of Galaxies, so I have little knowledge on it other than via the SWG Wiki. And I can't just join Galaxies now that its been shut down. Hope you have a lot of knowledge about those badges or know how to make them better, because I'm of little help with that even with the guidelines. Weedle McHairybug () 21:28, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Please note that your recent edit to the ST 321 article has been removed. There is no canon indication that the ship was designated as you edited it to be. I understand the logic you were trying to use to establish the addition as a fact, but since this information has already been considered to be speculative in previous discussions, it has no place in the article. Thanks. —Gethralkin 14:04, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

Weedle, please slow down and take a closer look at the articles you've been creating. You're making lazy mistakes such as removing infobox fields, failing to link obvious articles and add the correct categories, and including "The" in titles—all of which are basic mistakes that experienced editors shouldn't make this often. Please, take a minute to go over your work. Wookieepedia doesn't have a deadline. Cade Calrayn 00:39, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

Hi Weedle. In C-3PO article, you added that he claimed that his full designation was CV-3PO, with the "V" allegedly standing for "Versatility". I'm curious, what is the context of that statement?--Richterbelmont10 22:21, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

• Not that it matters, since Chee stated the line wasn't meant to be taken seriously (which resulted in me undoing my edit), but: In the novelization for A New Hope, when Owen Lars complained that he did not want a Protocol Droid, C-3PO quipped "No, sir—versatility is my middle name. See Vee Threepio—Vee for versatility—at your service." Weedle McHairybug () 22:27, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Weedle. A word of advice for you. When a Featured, Good or Comprehensive article needs an update, it's generally understood that the original author of the article, who maintains the article that they wrote, will update the article accordingly. I know you are very eager to update major articles, and the community appreciates your efforts, but I know I can speak for others as well when I say that it's considered to be something of an intrusion when you jump the gun and try to update certain articles before the original author has a chance to. There's nothing actually preventing you from doing so, but it's just one of those unwritten rules of community protocol. My suggestion to you is to take note of which status articles are currently being maintained (in other words, which original authors of which articles are still around) and which status articles are not being maintained. For status articles whose original authors are no longer editing and are no longer being maintained, those would be better for you to take a more proactive approach toward updating. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:00, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. Just for future reference, who was the original article for the Executor article? I want to make sure I run by the discovery with him/her so (s)he can update the article as necessary. Weedle McHairybug () 22:50, October 9, 2013 (UTC)
• Sorry, I meant "original author." Weedle McHairybug () 22:57, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

I think the episode is Holocron Heist, but I can't be sure. Either way, that would be the more suitable place for such things... it's potentially borderline OR but I'm no expert on such matters. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 14:16, October 26, 2013 (UTC)

== wIKI ==

Do you like Star Wars and RP? http://starwars-rp-fanon.wikia.com/wiki/Creating_your_Char

Weddle, are you sure that the smoking PSA is indeed canon? Commercials generally are OOU and are nothing but promotion. JangFett 14:02, October 30, 2013 (UTC)

What chapter in Darth Plagueis is the term conservative used? I can't seem to find it, thank you. Trip391 (talk) 12:46, November 2, 2013 (UTC)

I'll answer here since article talk pages are not for discussing a topic, but rather a change to a topic. Gay marriages certainly can occur in Star Wars as is the case with Goran Beviin and his husband Medrit Vasur. Trip391 (talk) 16:34, November 4, 2013 (UTC)

Hi! The info is found in at least one of the update pdf files on the minisite. I had to scroll down a bit on each pdf file, to page 2 on update #1, page 3 on update #2 and page 6 on update #3. There's a ship list with changes to game rules, including for the Praetor II and the Vigil-class corvette, on each of FFG's update pdfs. Thrackerzod (talk) 09:28, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Since you appear to be more familiar with The Star Wars, could you check to see if the spelling here is correct. Thanks, Weedle. JangFett 14:20, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, Weedle! Does the book actuallt state that Vader and Tarkin were in the Overbridge when they monitored the DS's hyperdrive? Asking that because both Windham's Roqoo interview and official blog post outright state that pic pertains to Hyperdrive Station A-226. Those two quotes are relevant to the matter:

Could you clarify? --LelalMekha (talk) 15:14, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

Hi! It doesn't have a context. Image is in the links. Thrackerzod (talk) 13:15, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hey Weedle, I was going through and removing old speculation from the Ark of the Covenant article, and I saw this. Does the source say anything about the TCW ark being the same as the 5 ABY ark? JangFett 01:50, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

• If I may chime in, the source material says this: "For the Kadann imposter, the glove was only another trophy in an already impressive collection—largely amassed by Lord Cronal and Rajah Ubooki’s many junk dealer brothers—that included a set of blood-red Mandalorian armor seized in the Imperial enslavement of Mandalore and the Ryloth Ark, once in the possession of Emir Wat Tambor (though, whether this chest was in truth one of several known replicas was uncertain)." --LelalMekha (talk) 01:52, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

Hello Weedle, I've reverted the edits to WED-15-I662, as, if what you gave me is all the info presented, it doesn't seem confirmed that the stolen droids came from the sandcrawler from ANH, as opposed to any other Jawas living on that planet. Even if they were from the sandcrawler, I wonder if the Jawas could have had more droids than what was shown onscreen in ANH, or even if they'd just purchased some more in between the sale and the destruction of the sandcrawler. But as is, the fact that the droids were "property stolen from Jawas on Tatooine" doesn't seem to make them necessarily from that particular sandcrawler. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:21, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Weedle, as a long-term editor such as you should know by now, you must tag battle articles with {{Conjecture}} if they are not directly named in the source. Almost all of the Waymancy battles you just made are completely conjectural. Please slow down and take more time in your article creation so that you don't make these mistakes. Cade Calrayn 01:19, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

• {{Conjecture}} means that the title is conjectural. Don't bold it in the intro. CadeCalrayn 01:29, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding information to articles, especially status articles, without sourcing it, as you did here. Over time these edits require us to have to go through and perform maintenance on these articles that should never have to happen. Not to mention the information you added was pointless and almost certainly not worth noting in an article of ours, and you didn't even say the track's name correctly. Be more careful and mindful when adding information to a status article next time. Thank you. MasterFred 14:35, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Hey, since you know a lot in Imperial Warlords, why don't you go update the Cronal article? We'd all like to hear the details of his survival and final death. Lord KOT (talk) 02:34, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Wheedle, in writing up the Reconquest of the Rim, you have repeatedly copied from other articles and pasted that same information into the RotR article. This is unacceptable. If you are going to continue to work on that article, please take the time to actually write up the content, and not just copy and paste parts of other articles to save time. Thank you, 501st 21:28, February 11, 2014 (UTC)

Just a quick reminder to you to try and avoid leaving spoilers in edit summaries. Not everyone has seen the TCW episodes yet. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:14, February 23, 2014 (UTC)

To be honest, Weedle, I am currently not interested in the main Imperial Army page. I'm working through all elements of the Imperial Sourcebook and not looking to do major overhaul work on large pages like that as I am more concerned about filling in the blanks on articles we do not currently have. For the record, however, I do not agree with the simple removing of a large body of text and replacing it with a table (I am aware that this was not done by you, but by Valkyriez). While the amount of information could have been reduced to account for the dedicated pages being created, the addition of a table in place of prose is akin to creating a list which is a discouraged practice. While it is good that you sought some type of mediation on the issue rather than descending into an edit war, the issue should really have been brought to the talk page first for a discussion between yourself, Valkyriez and Cade (and other interested parties) on how to proceed and find an amicable solution. After reviewing the situation, my suggestion would be to reinstate some of the text, with individual tables at the formation level (squad/platoon/etc) detailing the different types of specializations found within the formation level. Hopefully, that will strike the right balance that will be amenable to all editors, but I do encourage you to discuss this matter on the talk page with the other parties to ensure that the article does not suffer. Cheers, Sir Cavalier of One 09:39, March 23, 2014 (UTC)

Hey Weedle. Given your interest in Star Tours, I recommend you check and perhaps chime in this SH discussion: Forum:SH:Using Star Tours 2011 reopening material. Cheers. Stake black 16:13, April 13, 2014 (UTC)

Weedle, please do not leave empty sections in articles. As you're quite clearly copying from the other articles on the Card Game expansions, simply remove the sections that don't have content—the gallery, appearances, card list, etc. And please properly format the publisher summary as the original source does. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 18:36, September 30, 2014 (UTC)

• Weedle, why are you leaving the parenthetical in the passport links you're adding? What purpose does that serve? That is not how sources are listed in either Appearances/Sources lists nor in references. CadeCalrayn 01:35, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:08, October 15, 2014 (UTC)

• Just so we're clear, when you mentioned "reliable source", do you mean footnotes or listing the source in the Sources section? I want to make sure because I was certain I did the latter. Weedle McHairybug () 04:27, October 15, 2014 (UTC)

Off the top of my head, I can't think of any appearances. However, if it was a redlink, you might have luck tracking down which articles are linked to it through the "What Links Here" button on the article page and seeing if any are appearances or sources, or seeing if the redlinks are reffed on any pages. - Sir Cavalier of One 00:07, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

Just because you dont like that they are labeled infinities... doesnt make them not infinities. And the Manga are officially licensed material from lucasfilm... I dont know where you got the impression they were unlicensed dude.... but no amount of non-canonness can ever make something unlicensed. ralok (talk) 18:13, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

I don't care what the situation is, the Unlicensed templates are not "upgrades" from the Noncanon template. Unlicensed means that a product was released without being licensed by Lucasfilm; it's not a level of canonicity. Yes, Tao has been referenced in an in-continuity source; so has the Tusken and so has Shumari. However, the Alien Henchmen post explicitly leaves it open-ended as to whether the events of the manga actually happened, and to say that the events actually happened would be an assumption beyond what has been stated. Continuing to edit-war on this topic will likely result in blocks. Cade Calrayn 18:29, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

Weedle, this isn't the first time you've been warned about this. As an editor who's been around a while, you have no excuse for making the basic and frequent mistakes that you've been leaving in your articles. Take this for example. You left out the Eras template, which is a required part of every article, and Category:Imperial officers is unnecessary because Category:Stormtrooper officers is a subcategory of that. This edit is similarly unacceptable. If you're not finished with an article, don't hit save. As is obvious from the infobox, you copied this article from the original garrison one and rewrote it, and you left out the sources, categories, and references. There's really no excuse for this kind of continued errors. Cade Calrayn 15:36, November 19, 2014 (UTC)

Hi Weedle. Unfortunately, the Imperial Sourcebook does not go into detail on the unit breakdowns of the Stormtrooper corps. If they had, the information would have been added when I ran through the entirety of the appearances in the book. - Sir Cavalier of One 01:00, February 15, 2015 (UTC)

Firstly, please don't try to blame the tab system for your own errors. Secondly, copy-pasting an article is never acceptable; if you can't move something without an admin, then ask an admin. Thirdly, after discussion in IRC, your "line armor regiment" is nonsense—nowhere is that mentioned in the Handbook, and it's mentioned once in the ISB as another name for an armor regiment. I'm not quite sure what you were hoping to accomplish with this whole matter, but I'd strongly suggest you slow down and take a closer look at what you're doing when you're editing. Cade Calrayn 16:04, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

• Weedle, please try and say that you didn't copy-paste. Adding a few words doesn't change that fact. Rather than actually , you simply copied another article, added a few words, and pasted it in place believing it to be valid. That's unacceptable. And stop blaming others for your errors; the tab system has nothing to do with this at all, and I've no idea what you're talking about with redirects and histories. The tabs have nothing to do with it—edit histories are preserved until the article's deleted, whether by standard deletion or moving an article over the redirect. The edit history for the Death Star duels' perfectly fine.CadeCalrayn 16:33, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

Hey Weedle McHairybug. I'll check those comics you mentioned as soon as I can. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:21, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

• Sooo... Here's what I wrote about Palpatine's brief interventions in Showdown and The Final Trap:

Palpatine received a hologrammic communication from Darth Vader, who had just departed Ord Mantell after meeting there with Boba Fett. Vader informed his master that the Imperial starfleet had just started to search for the new Rebel base. During the conversation, Palpatine suspected that Vader had made other arrangements, and the armored Sith Lord admitted to have sicced Boba Fett and other bounty hunters on Han Solo, in hopes that they may also find Luke Skywalker. The Emperor was pleased with Vader's decisions, and encouraged him in his quest for Skywalker, telling him that "sometimes, the remote path leads to the goal first."(Showdown) Shorly thereafter, the Emperor recontacted Vader, asking him whether his deal with the bounty hunters had borne fruit. His apprentice told him that he had changed his plans, and now intended to capture Luke Skywalker on Verdanth, using a seemingly crashed Rebel shuttle as bait. That scheme was thwarted when Skywalker was rescued by R2-D2 and Han Solo. (The Final Trap)

I didn't add it to the article itself directly, because I'm not sure about the time placement. The article for Classic Star Wars 20 places those events in 3 ABY, but no source is provided to back this up. However, our Timeline of Legends media places thoses events in 0 ABY, and no source is given either... --LelalMekha (talk) 13:34, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

Hi Weedle, I'll have a look at the aggressor article next time I have my copy of stay on target to hand. I hadn't really thought about the X-Wing miniatures in a while since I've been concentrating on the new canon stuff, but I can have a look at the remaining sets sometime soon if you'd like me too. Most the information including pictures of all the cards is available on the X-wing wiki as far as I know if you'd like to do any yourself. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:45, March 11, 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I notice you've been adding to the ground warfare page with information from the Imperial Handbook. I don't yet have the book myself, so unfortunately everything I've been able to add to the "Galactic Civil War" section is a little Rebel biased. Would you be able to fill it out from the other perspective with some Imperial Handbook content, for example, Imperial Army doctrine and so forth?--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 09:40, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Is there an Imperial Starfighter Corps? I always got the impression from Warfare that the Empire's starfighters were entirely under the control of the Navy and the Empire did not maintain a Starfighter Corps as a separate arm. What does the Handbook say about it?--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 16:59, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

Eventually. First though I intend to pick the Atlas clean.--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 23:32, October 12, 2015 (UTC)

Hi Weedle - just a heads up about your addition to Screed. Firstly, {{WebCite}} should be used for all external website links when referencing. Also, eBay is by no means permanent; concluded listings are removed after a certain period of time so at some point, the references will disappear. Once that occurs, they will no be viable references for the article. - Sir Cavalier of One 16:12, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

• Okay. Do you have any ideas on how to source it besides eBay when I have to put the images up? Like you said, there won't be any viable references for the article once the eBay sites disappear. Weedle McHairybug () 16:33, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

Well, as you've probably seen, the big Legends/Canon switchover is imminent, so how about we give the old EU one last hurrah on Wookieepedia? What do you say to trying to get the Galactic Civil War article featured again? For many years it was the Star Wars, and given how much material there already is on the page, I'd say with a bit of a tidy-up we'd have a good chance of restoring it to Featured Article status. I've already done a bit to clean up references (putting in Ref Names and so forth), so what do you say to giving me a hand?--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 14:44, December 3, 2015 (UTC)

I'm well aware of the Lasan issue, and as I said it's being discussed. Cade Calrayn 20:32, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

• You're lying. I checked the Senate Hall forum, and it's definitely not even on the table. Weedle McHairybug () 20:35, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for edit-warring and general disruption. Weedle, I'm sorry, but you've crossed the line. IRC is a perfectly viable and reasonable venue for discussion, as clearly indicated by the Mofference that happened just this evening. The general consensus was to treat the walker and TIE as errors, though the Lasan Suppression apparently has some basis in earlier material. All of this could've been avoided if you had simply come into IRC. When/if you return, please be more amenable and cease your habits of edit-warring. Cade Calrayn 01:17, December 7, 2015 (UTC). To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified.

• Sorry, I probably was out of line there. However, I do still think that if you're going to settle something like this, it needs to actually be on written record, instead of someplace like a chat room where the administrators can conveniently forget about it later if they want to go against what they say. And yes, the IRC does qualify as that, and thus qualifies as a dirty trick. As Bluerock put it here: "Feel free to use it though. It's quicker than talk pages, though conversations aren't recorded. --Bluerock (talk) 17:31, April 4, 2013 (UTC)" If the conversations aren't recorded, how can it be a good way of settling things, especially when people can use that as an excuse to go against their promises? That's why I prefer forum posts. And for the record, they definitely couldn't have been errors, since the Canon/Legends split occurred in April, while that book was released in October, which meant that they had more than enough time to fix up any errors. Deleting words and images takes, what? Only a few minutes with a computer? Maybe if it was last minute, like barely a day before release, I'd buy the error claim, but not here. And if the Lothal bit can qualify as non-erroneous, we most certainly can claim the same with the walkers and Advanced V1. Weedle McHairybug () 22:11, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

That is *enough*. Bring it up again in a non-related forum, and you will be blocked for disrupting the site to prove a point. That's all I'll hear on the topic. Cade Calrayn 18:49, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

• First of all, it is related, or have you forgotten that they mentioned that there won't be any Legends continuations because of the whole Sequel Trilogy and canon/legends split. Second of all, I had to deal with mods who thought just because they were in charge back on places like SPPf and BMGf, they get to do whatever they please without consequence, so I have no reason to trust you or any other mods. But I'll stop if it gets you to stop getting at my back. Weedle McHairybug () 18:55, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

You are aware that there's an actual citation template that was made expressly for this purpose, are you not? I've even seen you use it when you've copy-pasted the expansion pack articles I've cleaned up. Cade Calrayn 23:12, February 12, 2016 (UTC)

The layout I generally stuck to for the Imperial Military, Imperial Navy, and Starfighter Corps articles goes as:

Role

History

Organization

Personnel

Equipment

Good luck!--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 07:15, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

In your recent article, the Amazon link is invalid. Is it possible for you to replace it? AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:34, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

• Did it. Was trying to Wookify the link with this: http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Joke-Book-CANCELLED/dp/148478877X/ref=sr_1_10?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1463612216&sr=1-10&keywords=star+wars+joke+bookWeedle McHairybug () 00:38, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

I need an answer to the question to edit one of his pages. I ask editors from that pages but I think only people on wookieepedia knew it, since they looking for those infomations all day. Thanks.User: Nosferatuorlok (talk) 10:21, June 5, 2016 (UTC)

• Other than the movie as well as a brief viewing of the Clone Wars episode involving a clone traitor, I never actually watched the series, so I'm not exactly knowledgeable on that front. That said, they don't explicitly unveil Palpatine as being the same as Darth Sidious until The Lawless, so probably not. Weedle McHairybug () 10:31, June 5, 2016 (UTC)
• In that case, is Sidious still the main villain of the Clone Wars? I need information to edit his page, but not on this wiki. Another wiki.

I realized that it was not the canon article sorry about the confusion.

I'd really love to join in, but right now I'm in the middle of a major move and my books are scattered across most of Scotland. I only have Warfare and Atlas with me right now, and I'd really need the Handbook to be any help. It'll be another two weeks before I can properly get back into it.--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 19:53, June 21, 2016 (UTC)

There is no collector's edition as far as I know, and neither of the links you gave me refers to a collectors edition unless you are misinterpreting the term "collectible." A hardcover 2nd Edition was printed in mid-1994, with a softcover reprinting in early-1995 but that's about it. - Sir Cavalier of One 11:19, June 25, 2016 (UTC)

I'm sure Star Wars: Galactic Atlas and Star Wars Galactic Maps are intended to be the same book, I can't really back up my claims though. Sorry. Brules 20:58, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

• Hmm... considering that they've got separate release dates, let's just assume they're different books for now. Besides, Atlas doesn't even mention Rogue One, while Maps does. Weedle McHairybug () 21:04, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

I'm probably going to do the same thing as I did for the Imperial Navy: start with the biggest formations first then work my way down, describing the different subordinate units as I go. I have a good mind to create a whole new article for the Army's order of battle as well. I found the big list that used to be on the page in the edit history, but converting all the links to Legends and dealing with grammar and image issues is going to be a nightmare. I might make a Googledoc for it before submitting it here if you want to help?--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 15:41, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

• Sure. Go on ahead with that Googledoc. I'll probably need your Google account to see it, though. And fair enough. Weedle McHairybug () 16:25, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Before the individual fleet articles get moved I want to do some "headquarters" and "administrative organization" stuff for the Combined Defense Forces of the New Republic article. Do you have any New Republic era sourcebooks that could help out?--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 17:55, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

I dont think it is claimed in Episode III, that Padmés Funeral was initially planned to be cremated at the Funeral Temple, according to Complete Locations thats what the Naboo dictates them (see here), but Padmés Funeral was not planned to include that.

On the enemies section of Cloud City there's an image of a Red Snowtrooper labeled "Darth Vader's Security Force". They're mentioned later in the book once, "On the top pathway, you'll face the elite troopers from Darth Vader's Security Force and plenty of Speeder Bikes." That's it. Brules 20:48, November 24, 2016 (UTC)

• Okay. So, should we create an article on them, considering we did with the Speeder Bike Assault Force and also Vader's Special Force Troopers? Weedle McHairybug () 20:55, November 24, 2016 (UTC)

From what I can tell only Super Star Wars: Return of the Jedi got a gameboy port. The other two seem to be gameboy ports of Star Wars (1991 video game) and The Empire Strikes Back (video game) for the NES.

I'll try and get to fixing up the Super Return of The Jedi page at some point, but I still have Super ESB and the original Super Star Wars to get through, so it'll be some time before I get there. I'll make sure to keep an eye out for the blue guard though. Brules 19:59, November 25, 2016 (UTC)

• Fair enough. I wasn't saying you should seek it right now (like you said, you still have Super ESB and the original Super Star Wars to finish regarding edits), just when you are able to do Super Return of the Jedi. Weedle McHairybug () 20:01, November 25, 2016 (UTC)

I found it at a Super Saver in Columbus, NE. I would just keep my eyes on magazines stands at big book stores, your local wal-mart, or Target. E-Bay was the only place i could find a title for this magazine.--CC-1990 (talk) 16:47, November 26, 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I don't want to start an edit war or anything so I thought I'd say it here! But Saw doesn't say anything about potentially having to kill her, he says that people were starting to figure out she was the daughter of a science officer and that they were people who wanted to use her as hostage, that's supported by the novel too. Unless I've missed anything I would say there is nothing to say the alternative to him dumping her was to kill her

The time stamp is around 4:30; you'll need HD selected to see it. I know you've had a vested interest in Star Tours in the past, and I've been looking at some at some of your past conversations while working. - AV-6R7 20:18, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what Spinners is supposed to be. I don't remember anything in Super Empire Strikes Back that looked like a Spinner. I think it's possible that it might have been an Orbot Droid. Brules Talk 04:40, February 13, 2017 (UTC)

Are you going to create an article for Disciples of Harmony? I'm just curious. --Rakhsh (talk) 20:05, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

• Just took care of it. Sorry it took so long, wasn't sure if it actually merited an article initially. Weedle McHairybug () 20:23, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Weedle. Considering I don't have a bot and there are more than 1500 pages linking to the template, I'm not going to systematically add the archival fields to them. If you're willing to take up that task (or some of it), the addition of the field is as simple as this. (Naturally, make sure the link works and all.) Cheers! Imperators II 09:50, May 10, 2017 (UTC)

It's done. I just need a few minutes to find the right image for it. Brules Talk 23:19, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

New aces pack for Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game was announced yesterday per [3]. Rakhsh (talk) 16:08, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

• Just created the article, after some difficulty. Weedle McHairybug () 16:42, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Looking at some of the articles revealing that logo, I believe it is actually a logo for the "Parks and Resorts" presentation that will discuss the place. Not a logo for the land itself. --JMM (talk) 16:13, June 8, 2017 (UTC)

A Jedi and especially a Sith are never "unarmed", as both have great power at their fingertips constantly, the latter in the literal sense.--Boris Baran () 20:12, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

Hey, whilst I.understand what you're saying, we aren't supposed to copy the legends page onto the xanon one, we have to write them from scratch, you can use the legends one as a guide to see what to write but just not copy --Lewisr (talk) 18:47, July 21, 2017 (UTC)

Just so we're on the same page, I don't have access either. I saw the third Supremacy image on a recent Stuependous Wave video, I don't have the image. We could only screenshot it from there, but I'm sure Suependous only found it too, since I doupt he has the app himself, so it should be somewhere. I'll upload the 2BB-2 and BB-4 image.--ZapikCZ (talk) 08:01, September 2, 2017 (UTC)

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8rWpD5NTE8&t=27s No idea how to find the image anywhere else.--ZapikCZ (talk) 10:25, September 2, 2017 (UTC)

Looking closer into the Kenner Star Destroyer toy, it looks like the actual text on the toy's box mentions "Grand Vizier", which was leftover from a cut scene where Sate Pestage is the first person Vader talks to before the Emperor appears as a hologram. But it was in toy CATALOGS that they say "Grand Emperor". This article at starwars.com mentions it. I think I'll add all that info to the article: http://www.starwars.com/news/from-icy-trenches-to-ewok-campfires-kenner-playsets-part-2. And here is a link to that JC Penney Catalog: http://www.wishbookweb.com/FB/1980_JCPenney_Christmas_Catalog/#438 --JMM (talk) 14:35, September 12, 2017 (UTC)

Here's the link. I think there's also a companion magazine called Journal of the Whills that has other material. Anyway, a page for Star Wars - Das offizielle Magazin already exists. If you have any questions, I think @germanjedi on Twitter should be the person you should ask.--ZapikCZ (talk) 08:47, October 22, 2017 (UTC)

Hello, quick question, I'm pretty new to this, how do you make a template PAGE and not a template where the type is visible. --BenBenson1 () 16:22, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

Hi Weedle! If you're going to create any more pages about characters or anything else from The Last Jedi, please make sure you add the moviespoiler tag at the top. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:04, December 18, 2017 (UTC)

did they actually say trillions in the movie? that's a pretty big plothole, because it's really not trillions considering established limitations of hyperspace routes

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Hyperspace_route

boba fett literally tracks the falcon by eye without any sort of technology because there are only a limited number of stellar bodies that could possibly be safely jumped to from a specific trajectory, i'm pretty sure they even mention it in SW:rebs

This is a general warning for you regarding proper creation of articles. Per Wookieepedia:Manual of Style#Tense, all in-universe articles are to be written in past tense, which you violated here. While a single incident like this normally wouldn't be cause for citation, the fact that you have been warned for this and similar violations multiple times before and the fact that you have been editing here for almost ten years now makes this simply unacceptable. If I see this again, I will be issuing you a block from editing. Don't let it come to that. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:53, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

Reply the (Negastrike Platoon edits) message:

• Really?, weird!, but thanks. I didn't know that. One more thing. I have to admit that I didn't realized that you counter-edited me, neither the first or second time. Goodbye and have nice day. RC-0407 (talk)

Hey Weedle, although you updating Solo-related articles is appreciated, please take more care in your edits, as many of them are unlinked and feature redundant refs. There is no immediate hurry to update these articles, so please don't just rush them, as others have to clear them up. Thank you. Tommy Macaroni 20:09, June 18, 2018 (UTC)

• Okay, fine. Weedle McHairybug () 20:23, June 18, 2018 (UTC)

Please stop capitalizing "Publisher's Summary" in every single article you create. It's "Publisher's summary." We don't capitalize every word in section titles. How long have you been editing here now? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:08, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

• I won't remind you again. Section headers are not to be formatted in title case, per the Layout Guide. If you do this again, I will block you from editing. Consider this your final warning. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:09, October 9, 2018 (UTC)

Hiya Weedle. I have a question about the TIE Defender combat medallion article you created a couple years ago. It mentions that Maarek Stele "received all three versions of this medal after completing the training ops relating to the Star Wing," a phrase present since the very first version of the article. But the rest of this article says nothing about Star Wings. I note that several of these medallion articles have the same text pasted in, and I wonder if that phrase is a copy/paste error from Assault Gunboat combat medallion, which contains the exact same phrase (and it makes sense in that context). Most likely the TIE Defender combat medallion page should say "...training ops relating to the TIE/D Defender," but I'm not familiar with the game so wanted to verify with you first. Thanks! Asithol (talk) 01:47, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

When you add publication information to an article like this, please make sure to also update the corresponding year article (in this case, 2018). Otherwise, that information is likely to not get added promptly or potentially ends up getting forgotten entirely. Thanks for your help. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:23, August 26, 2018 (UTC)

While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:06, September 18, 2018 (UTC)

• And for Pete's sake, please stop uploading images with gibberish file names. Take a moment and change that to something. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:07, September 18, 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from contributing for 1 month for continuing to create articles with section headers in title case, following explicit warnings to stop. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:59, November 20, 2018 (UTC) You have been blocked from contributing for 3 months for continuing to violate site consensus with regards to this same issue. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:58, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

You've been warned before about creating articles with empty sections, so stop doing it already. It's unnecessary and useless. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:42, May 2, 2019 (UTC)

• If you're open to suggestions, I've got one. How about creating a pre-loadable template for articles like magazines, magazine articles, games, books, characters, etc., etc.? You know, similar to what Wikitroid or Batman Wiki does with its articles? That would solve the problem easily. Weedle McHairybug () 23:12, May 2, 2019 (UTC)

Remember to put Template:1st in the pages that you are creating. --Rakhsh (talk) 14:32, May 31, 2019 (UTC)

This is a general warning to you regarding the proper attribution and sourcing of articles. Never is it acceptable to include speculatory information in articles accompanied by a question mark, which is only serving to admit that you know the information you're adding is not verifiably accurate. Considering A) proper attribution of articles is the hallmark of our purpose here; B) you've been editing Wookieepedia for 10 years now and have absolutely no excuse for this; and C) the fact that you've been warned for attribution issues before, you have exactly zero leeway with me beyond this initial warning. You're going to need to go back to each of the articles you've created and remove these question-mark speculations. Failure to properly rectify this issue and/or continuing this practice will result in a block from editing. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:25, May 31, 2019 (UTC)

• Your non-response to this message and the fact that you've moved on to editing other things tells me you're not taking this seriously. So let me make this perfectly clear for you: I'm giving you until 0:00 UTC time Monday morning (which is tomorrow night in your time zone) to fix these articles, or I'm going to issue you a block for the policy violations previously cited to you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:28, June 1, 2019 (UTC)
• It's not acceptable to create articles based on information you find on the Completely Unreliable Star Wars Encyclopedia or any other fan site. The only reliable sources you should be creating articles from are officially licensed publications you have actually taken the time to verify the information from yourself. Impressively, you've found a new angle from which to circumvent our attribution requirements. Since this is a first from you, I'm giving you this one and only warning. Furtherance will result in a block from editing. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:47, September 18, 2019 (UTC)

This message is to remind you that external links are to be cited using the {{WebCite}} template, in accordance with Wookieepedia's Manual of Style, which you have already been notified about. The reference formatting in your edit here is not permissible. You are expected to go back and fix that reference and adhere to this practice in the future. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:45, August 13, 2019 (UTC)

• You're still missing the most critical field of the Citeweb template: archiveurl, which has been a requirement for citing external links for 3.5 years now. I expect to see you continue to apply this in your future edits. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:28, August 15, 2019 (UTC)

Hey Weedle, if you look at the image it actually looks like its roughly halfway between TFA/TLJ and TROS, which makes sense because Galaxy's Edge Black Spire is 4 months after TFA, and TROS/Resistance season 2 are the only things on the 35 ABY point in that image --Lewisr (talk) 14:58, August 24, 2019 (UTC)

Please use the correct tense, the articles should be in past tense. --Lewisr (talk) 12:46, September 15, 2019 (UTC)

• Once again, I must remind you about using the right tense, its really not that difficult and there's really no excuse for using the wrong tense. --Lewisr (talk) 15:43, December 27, 2019 (UTC)

With regard to your recent edit here, Wookieepedia has recently updated its rules for link formatting, which requires that italics be placed inside link brackets. Please familiarize yourself with these and all site policies, and adjust your edits accordingly. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:32, September 18, 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you.

It doesn't matter if your attempted addition to a Wookieepedia article "literally says the source in there." Every contribution to Wookieepedia requires proper attribution and referencing, as outlined in the Sourcing and Attribution policies. There is no such thing as "self-sourcing statements." To put this in layman's terms, every sentence you add to a Wookieepedia article from now on needs to have a reference note attached to the end of it. Considering you have been warned for this and informed of our attribution requirements multiple times now, and thus have had plenty of opportunity to digest and apply our standards and practices, not to mention you have been editing Wookieepedia for and have no excuse not to be 100% familiar with all of our policy requirements, you will not be issued another warning for this. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:38, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

• Tantive IV/Legends
• Executor-class Star Dreadnought/Legends
• Sensor globe
• Persecutor
• Intimidator

You have been blocked from editing for one month for repeated violations of our Sourcing and Attribution policies, as well as an unneeded antagonistic attitude that flies in the face of our Civility policy. Our Sourcing policy explicitly states that all articles must be completely sourced, including the "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles. "It literally says the source in there" is not a valid source and you, as a veteran editor, know this. Instead of heeding advice, you choose to adopt an antagonistic approach and accuse Toprawa of impropriety. This is unacceptable behavior. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. 1358 (Talk) 19:30, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

• In the event you return from your block, I'm going to respond to your latest post for your benefit in the hopes that you understand why your editing practices are at fault. The absence of proper referencing on one article doesn't make it ok to repeat improper referencing on another article. Just because you find one or a thousand articles doing something the wrong way doesn't justify you doing something the wrong way too. All those articles mean is that they haven't been properly referenced yet. We have limited manpower on a wiki of more than 150,000 articles. Not everything is going to get done in a timely fashion. Regardless, it doesn't matter what any other article or user is doing; you are still required to follow all of Wookieepedia's site policies. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:52, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

If you're going to create articles for upcoming books, please add the Future product template at the top. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:49, January 28, 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from contributing for 1 month for adding unverified information to articles. You have been warned and blocked for this so many times now, I'm not even going to say anything else. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that your edit to smoke generator lamp‎‎ added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 21:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

• Per aboveOOM 224༼༽talk༼༽ 13:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am messaging you in regards to your work on Ajax and Formidable. Thanks to NanoLuuke, I was able to determine that they are in fact not from X-Wing as you can only see 5 Star Destroyers in total in the opening, while Imperial Handbook specifies that there were 10 in the battle and only names half of them. As such, I have removed X-Wing from Appearances as assuming they appear in the cutscene is pure speculation. You've already been warned and blocked multiple times about adding such unverified claims to articles, so it's in your best interest to refrain from it completely in the future. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Please include proper referencing. Your edit here failed to do so; "<ref>''Star Wars'': Episode VI ''Return of the Jedi'' director's commentary.</ref> Fan26 () 05:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

• Also, the information here has nothing to do with socialism. The people's war is a military strategy; May Day parades are just parades. They have nothing to do with the concept of socialism. OOM224 09:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Read this. I'm not fixing your future edits and will revert on sight any improperly cited changes. If you want help with sourcing then ask me or another editor, but I will not tolerate more of your lazily sourced additions. OOM 224 20:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)