Talk: XXLVenom998

Thanks, you also. :) —Cal Jedi 04:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you as well. You too! CC7567 04:40, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

And a happy New Year to you, too! :D Trak Nar 07:06, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Happy New Year, Venom! Thanks for the wishes. Also, a heads-up that you should remove the category from the bottom of your body armor workbench, as currently, the workbench is showing up in the actual Trash compactor. Cheers. Menkooroo (talk) 11:40, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Your category for individuals killed by Darth Maul has been deleted. We do not, and will not, have categories like that. Grand Moff Tranner 22:00, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Because, quite frankly, it's pointless and a waste of space. Such categories have been proposed in the past, but never implemented. A system like that would inevitably lead to the creation of single-member categories that would serve no purpose whatsoever. Grand Moff Tranner 22:07, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
• Venom, your opinion of administrators like Master Jonathan and myself is disturbing. Frankly, it is childish of you to accuse the both of us of being, in your own words, "'delete-everything-that-non-administrators-created' admins" simply because we don't agree with you. Furthermore, it is the job of an administrator to give an opinion on any issue that may arise and develop Wookieepedia in accordance with established policies. Being combative will get you and your idea nowhere. Grand Moff Tranner 17:00, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

In most cases, as long as subpages follow the user page policy, they should not be subject to deletion. CC7567 20:18, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

• See here. CC7567 20:27, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, as Winterz said, the Mission to Mustafar from Episode III is the most-looked for article with that name, so it needs to be kept where it is now. CC7567 21:32, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

• We still can't assume airdates, but I think it would be reasonable to assume that "Shades of Reason" and "The Lawless" are the fifteenth and sixteenth episodes, respectively, given that they're the rest of the story arc. CC7567 09:05, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Can you post on the pageo f "Missing in Action" that the episode's production number is labeled 506? thank u. Unsigned comment by User:173.63.68.122 (talk)

Can you post on the page of "Missing in Action" that the episode was written by Brent Friedman and directed by Steward Lee, please? Thank u.

According to the block log, you have not been blocked recently, and I have not blocked anyone recently except Detreko. I'm not sure what log you were checking, but no, I did not block you. Cheers.—Cal Jedi 14:15, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

• You might have been caught in an IP block, but without a block ID, it's impossible to know which block affected you. 1358(Talk) 14:43, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Hey XXL, please use an official source when sourcing that subtitle in the TCW season five article. Otherwise, it will be regarded as speculation. Do you know where it came from other than that wiki? JangFett 15:59, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

• You seem to not get how our sourcing policy works. Basically unless that subtitle comes from an official source or an interview with someone from LFL, it will be regarded as speculation. Official sources are licensed by LFL or acknowledged by them. We don't trust fan blogs, random websites, or wikis since they could be filled with speculation. JangFett 18:14, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Can you add on the page for the "Clone Wars" episode, "The Lawless" that R2-D2 makes an appearance?

I am sorry for changing the picture of Dathomir. --Unsigned comment by Darth Hill.

Yes I do. But just because those episodes form a story arc does not mean we can assume that they were produced in that order. A number of arcs in previous seasons were produced out of chronological/airing order. — DigiFluid 18:10, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

• I agree that's definitely the most likely end result. But production numbers 4.19-21 are also still yet to be revealed, and more to the point, we can't be putting in unverified info—much less citing resources that don't say what we're saying they say. — 18:43, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Can you please post on the page for the upcoming "Clone Wars" episode, "The Lawless" that R2-D2 makes an appearance considering the book "Shadow Conspiracy" says so? Pleeasse?!?!?

Thanks for my pleas. Oh and one more thing can you also add that the episode will air on February 2nd? Because just today, it was confirmed on cartoonnetwork.com's schedule that "The Lawless" will air on February 2nd at 9:30 AM,

here is the location:www.cartoonnetwork.com/schedule. Now just click on tomorrow's schedule and click the bar with the clone wars and you'll see "The Lawless" airs on February 2nd.

you're welcome but I also meant post the air date on the page of the episode "The Lawless" not just the page for "The Clone Wars: Season Five".

You're welcome but I also meant post the air date on the page of the episode "The Lawless" not just the page for "The Clone Wars: Season Five". So, can you also post the airdate on the page of "The Lawless", too? Pleeaassee?!?!?!?

Can you please post on the page of the upcoming "Clone Wars" episode "The Lawless" that it airs on February 2nd and respond to my message? Pleeeasseee????

Hey there, could you start uploading pictures in PNG instead of JPG? It would make the replacement process (for the Blu-ray version) much easier. Thanks in advance. Alexrd (talk) 13:05, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

See {{Hutt Cartel character infobox}}. For Black Sun, mostly {{Criminal character infobox}} is used. As for the search icons, they're used for the Search function available in Monobook. CC7567 16:09, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

It was removed because the citation was for the CN schedule. The CN schedule does not list the production number, thus the citation is incorrect. If the TCW site lists it, that is what should be cited. — DigiFluid 11:13, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

That site is nowhere near official. It's run by SuperShadow, who isn't an affiliate of Lucasfilm in any sense of the word. (This is why third-party, non-Lucasfilm-affiliated websites may post official information, but it's not a blanket rule.) CC7567 14:21, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Please try not to take the comments personally. The reason that people are leaving objections to the article in that manner is because usually—not always, because there are always exceptions, but usually—the person who nominates an article as a GAN or FAN is expected to be in a position to handle the objections, whether they be about the article's source coverage or the writing/formatting of the article itself. The nominator is usually the person who dedicates himself or herself to improving the article, and reviewers direct their objections toward the nominator. All articles are expected to adhere to all of the rules at the top of the GAN page prior to nomination, which is why criticism might seem rather harsh. If you have any other questions, I'd be happy to answer them for you; please just take note of that's how the GAN page operates. CC7567 18:08, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

The Clone Wars: Darth Maul: Shadow Conspiracy. CC7567 19:09, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

• You wouldn't happen to be looking for Star Wars: Maul: Lockdown would ya? DarthRevan1173 (Long live Lord Revan) 22:08, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

You should fill the picture upload form properly, when uploading new pictures. Don't leave them like this. Alexrd (talk) 19:10, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've got my own Star Wars wiki called the Bountypedia Wiki. But hardly anyone is on it, please could you tell me how to make it a popular Wiki?

Hey XXL, please try not to add blank sections into articles. You can add sections within articles, but try to add content within those sections. It not only does not look right, it does not help the article in any way. Thanks, JangFett 15:34, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

• I am not questioning its importance. I meant that you added sections without content in the Savage Opress article. Try to avoid that. JangFett 17:07, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Looking at the history, it looks like everything has been restored. CC7567 19:18, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what you're talking about. But if you see it on the site, you might be able to learn by looking at how it's formatted. Other than that, I don't think I know how to format that. CC7567 20:44, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

All you have to do is place {{Delete}} on the page and an administrator will delete the redirect so that it can be created as a new article. I've done that for you. CC7567 18:50, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Try to avoid adding in miscellaneous and trivial information about TCW episodes in a behind the scenes section. Over the past few months, typically some users have been adding in bts information from SW.com. While that seems fine and well since they're sourced to SW.com, we do not need to go any further and actually add who or what appeared in the episode in the bts. Hope this makes sense, JangFett 21:32, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

• XXL, please see WP:TRIVIA. Thank you, JangFett 15:15, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Sure, as long as there are enough pages (with significant notability) to populate the category. CC7567 18:19, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

• You should be able to make it at Category:Mandalorian super commandos. Look at other category pages if you need help with formatting. CC7567 19:08, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Your comment on Cade's talk page is erroneous. His plurality is quite accurate because I don't do pictures in Appearances either. Admittedly, I don't do most things either because my only interest is adding links in articles. Whether the rest of the users do or don't is irrelevant. The fact that there is one other person who also doesn't justifies the plurality. I propose we first ascertain whether Cade means "we" as the site as a whole or "we" as himself and the others whom he has encountered who don't. For all we (by which is meant you and I) know, Cade could be using the royal "we", implying himself and the power endowed by Divine Right. Or he could have a split personality. Do please be careful. Assumptions are the foremost contributors to misunderstanding. Karohalva (talk) 17:18, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

This is the link you are looking for: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Requests_for_user_rights Make yourself heard. Spread the word. Anonnonnon () 14:23, February 27, 2013 (UTC)