Talk: TK-462

Hello, for the record IMDB doesn't really count as a credible source so you'd also need to add another source that can be used, the template for imdb is here though, hope this helps --Lewisr (talk) 16:12, April 6, 2018 (UTC)

While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:01, April 15, 2019 (UTC)

Hi, please use the full template when you're going to use. And please format your articles properly such as like this. A bit of care and attention isn't asking for much, and goes a long way to improving the site, thanks --Lewisr (talk) 23:33, November 28, 2019 (UTC)

• Once again, please use the full template. --Lewisr (talk) 03:13, December 31, 2019 (UTC)
• Sorry, I'm not exactly sure which template I messed up. Is it the Image template? Additionally, how do I fix it? Just when I thought I'm able to complete a page correctly... thanks for your help! --TK-462 () 03:17, December 31, 2019 (UTC)

No it's okay no worries! You mean this? Sounds like a good idea haha! --Lewisr (talk) 18:13, December 31, 2019 (UTC)

• You should add it onto the image, but before you even upload it the template should appear so you can fill it in! Does it not show up? --Lewisr (talk) 17:25, January 2, 2020 (UTC)

Do these things specifically say bioweapon though? If not then I wouldn't add them. You need to clarify which sources uses the word 'bioweapon', or the page may be deleted --Lewisr (talk) 20:08, January 2, 2020 (UTC)

• Feel free to add the ones that use bioweapon, but just because some are on the blue shadow virus page doesn't automatically mean they should go on the bioweapon page --Lewisr (talk) 20:34, January 2, 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Please make sure to format your uploads properly, including file categories. I've done it for one of your uploads; please do the same to . Let me know if you need help! Cheers, 1358 (Talk) 00:33, January 3, 2020 (UTC)

Hi TK, just to give you some advice RE:Unidentified warehouse (Nakadia). If a CAN or GAN goes over its word limit, the first thing you should do is ask a member of the EC or AC to archive the nomination. Once it has been archived, you can move the article up the ladder and nominate it for GAN or FAN. Please do not immediately open a GAN before the CAN has been archived, as you did with the warehouse, as the article had two active nominations at the same time. Furthermore, please do not remove either the nomination from the CAN page or the CAnom template from the article, as these duties are the responsibility of the EC member archiving the nomination. We need to make note of the specific edit when the CAnom template was removed, and you doing it yourself only confuses our archives. Lastly, please do not copy over objections from the CAN, as the GAN a separate nomination so you start afresh. You should ideally address any outstanding objections before or while waiting for an EC to archive the CAN, then saying in the comments "all CAN objections have been addressed" if necessary.

Please bear this in mind for the next time this happens. You haven't done anything wrong, I just wanted to better inform you of our procedures. Overall, I think you may have been a little overenthusiastic when setting up the GAN, so please next time just take a moment to wait for the CAN to be archived before moving onto the GAN. Rushing through the process will not get the article passed any sooner. Thank you for your cooperation. Tommy Macaroni 09:32, May 1, 2020 (UTC)

Hi TK. Judging by your edits here, 204.16.58.14 is another account for you, so I would like to inform you of our Sockpuppetry policy. Whether you forgot to log in to your main account or not, sockpuppetry is strictly forbidden, and you should use your registered account at all times. Although there is clearly no malicious intent in you not using your account, such as ban evasion, Wookieepedia still has a no tolerance policy for any examples of sockpuppetry, so I would like to ask you to please remember to sign in with your main account and stop using 204.16.58.14 for editing. Thank you for your cooperation. TommyMacaroni 18:34, May 3, 2020 (UTC)

• Yep! Sorry about that, I was editing off of my phone and I didn't notice until I tried signing a comment. Thanks for the heads up, it won't happen again. TK-462 () 18:52, May 3, 2020 (UTC)

Hey! Please let me know whether you finished updating the article, so I can review the changes. Keep in mind that the nom is approaching the seven-days inactivity mark (counting from my latest comment on May, 9th), after which it could be subject for removal. Therefore, your reply is needed before the 16th. 13:11, May 14, 2020 (UTC)

• Hey! Sorry, I haven't been able to connect on the IRC, i wanted to check with you that that the objections had been addressed. Thanks for the heads up! TK-462 () 17:00, May 14, 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that my objection to Blizzard Force unit two-two-eight-seven is almost a week old, and the nomination will be removed if it's not addressed by tomorrow. I'm leaving this message here as I believe you may have missed it entirely. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:32, May 19, 2020 (UTC)

Hi TK, I have just removed your nomination for Hez's squad. The GAN currently states: "Users must successfully complete one Good article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the GAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful GA nominations before they can have three, and three successful GA nominations before they can have four." Now this is a recently passed rule, so it would not have affected your old nominations. Despite you previously having 4 active GANs with no successful ones, those nominations were grandfathered in for the sake of fairness. However, when you nominated this new article that was not grandfathered in, it was liable to this new rule. As such, it has been deleted, as you then had three active GANs despite not having the required two successful nominations. Your current two GANs, while ordinarily breaking this rule, will not be removed due to this system. However, any further nominations from you will be liable to removal via this system. Thank you for your cooperation. TommyMacaroni 08:51, May 27, 2020 (UTC)

Hey Tk! Sorry to mess you about with this again, but this time we can actually date Mixer's death to 21 BBY, Star Wars Helmet Collection 76 dates Ponds death in R2 Come Home to 21 BBY, then using the episode order you can obviously work out the rest. Once again apologies haha --Lewisr (talk) 02:52, June 14, 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks for the heads up, glad we can get a concrete date figured out. TK-462 () 17:20, June 14, 2020 (UTC)

thanks

NBDani 13:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)