Talk: Fan26

• This shit does feel good. () 16:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

My dellow felegates, EduCorps Meeting 94 is scheduled for October 9, 17:00 UTC / 13:00 ET. Please leave notes if unable to attend!

Remember, remember, the 5th of November. Champagne will be served from 20:00 UTC / 16:00 ET onwards. OOM 224 21:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for one month for violating the Civility policy and Fandom's Terms of Use in regards to intolerant comments made on-site and in Discord. I hope you take this time-out to reflect upon these incidents and return with a better perspective on making Wookieepedia a welcoming place to all. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Imperators II 18:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey Fan and welcome back!

Just an FYI that I've added some updated proposed wording to the above SH as you've commented on the discussion :) Manoof 10:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Hey Fan, just letting you know that the CAN you voted on, Lerrimore Contracting Company, is now a GAN. WHAM! Just thought I'd let you know given the update, thanks man! Manoof 10:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

stop deleting my poops!

• Lewis, you can leave this on my talk page it's almost funny. Almost. () 01:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

• oh, i'm proud of this () 19:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Imperators II 13:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I saw you reverted my changes regarding the Post–Great Hyperspace War counterinvasion. Can we discuss the reason? I think the original tone and wording of the article portrays the Jedi as destroyers of culture, even using terms like "iconoclastic" and "pillaging". However, the manual books I found (namely the Tales of the Jedi companion which I added as source) about the Sith artifacts and scrolls describing them as dangerous weapons and harmful texts with almost Lovecraftian traits and harmful messages. I think it would be necessary to make it clear that these objects and "knowledge" were not something to weep for. I often see people on the internet interpreting this event as some kind of "cultural genocide" and I fear the text in it's current form is supporting that take and leading people to sympathize with the villains of the story and antagonizing the Jedi Order. What do you think?

Bendeguz01 (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello. May I know why you tacitly reverted my edit without any comment?ShibaBrother (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I found usage of a demonym that was not officially stated in source material, should it still be used as the demonym or should a phrase like "People of Weik" be used instead of the unofficial "Weikian" in infoboxes as the culture of an item or demonym of a planet? On a related note, what category should be used for individuals from a planet without an official demonym? Boats1014 (talk) 11:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks for the response, but I'm not gonna bother trying to correct it since I don't feel like wasting my time if valid edits are just gonna be reverted and fanon added back onto the site. Boats1014 (talk) 13:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, what’s the point in that?

• H, I reverted you here because you were removing sourced info from an article. () 21:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate the advice, but perhaps you can help me understand this policy a bit better. To me, as a user of Wookieepedia, I had never heard of this character and happened upon the name while reading about Omega. I didn't know that there was another female (sexed, not gendered) clone of Jango Fett. To me, as a user who gets on Wookieepedia for information hoping to find all that there is known on a Star Wars topic, it seems that female Jango Fett clones would be of interest because of the genetic mutation considering that, at least, Omega is unaltered. I noticed on this character's page that there isn't a category for female clones of Jango Fett. My question is more of a Wookieepedia question for the article instead of asking info about the character. Is this not how I should go about it? Is this not considered a question for the article? Admittedly, I am very bad with words. Could I have worded this differently? Just FYI in case you see more of these questions from me on Talk pages, I'm working on a huge Fett clone project. I'm coming across a lot of things that I'm questioning in many articles, but because I don't have time to invest in taking care of each individual issue as I come across them, I've been posting these questions on the articles' Talk pages. I've discussed this with admin on Discord and on here, as well, and I was told it was fine because most of this stuff is about the articles themselves. These are all things that I can hopefully get back to after I've completed my project, but it might be a long time from now. Red Heathen (talk) 04:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

I checked the version history, and so far I have not edited anything you have (neither the title nor the first sentence), so will there be any contradictions/could I keep editing without any conflicts?—Vuvalan (Talk) 03:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

In recognition for your leadership and drive to complete Wookieeproject SWTOR, the friendship and help you have shown me, and as a way to get back at allllllll the "wonderful" dms, I present you with both an award and a punishment

I hardly see it as irrelevant and am sure others would also. There is obviously a connection there due to Sarrassian iron and the way it was established in Legends. Jason Fry has also recently explained that Story Group is trying to maintain continuity when it comes to Map related subjects. I'm going to replace the info as it was sourced and clearly explained. Thanks! LadyNeret (talk) 03:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

• Hi Fan26 sorry, I was a bit time-poor yesterday so didn't really have time to explain that very well. The reason I put it there is because both Niful and the belt most likely reside in the same system as Sarrassia, given that geologically Sarrassian iron comes from Sarrassia. Neither Niful and the belt have a locked-down location in the canon sources yet but given the Legends Sith background for this region of space and the canon Sith events in this region of space, combined with the geological nature of the area as well as with Jason Fry's recent comments regarding Story Groups stance on map subjects and honoring what came before I thought it was important to note the connections without adding speculation to the page. There is an implied connection with all the sources as a whole but not apparent when reading all those pages individually. I've seen many pages across the Wook, FA & GA included that in the absence of evidence note connections but firmly state that it has yet to be clarified/confirmed by Lucasfilm and felt that it was appropriate in this circumstance. Thanks LadyNeret (talk) 03:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

That's really not helpful when trying to verify that the system name is explicitly ("something" system). :S The first appearance really only tells us that the system appears in the source but not what the system was called. And people keep reverting when I put {1stID} on pages. I'm only following how FA/GA articles are sourced with regard to system names so I continue cleaning up Star Wars Galaxy Map page. LadyNeret (talk) 04:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

• Most FA/GA that I've seen at least have a citation after the name. LadyNeret (talk) 05:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

The author of the map has clearly explained that this is not the case. Did you even read the link? LadyNeret (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

• You're right that was crossing a line, I apologise and retract my statements. I'm leaving now. LadyNeret (talk) 05:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thankyou for explaining. I'll look at the revert and see if I can better word/source it. The issue I'm trying to untangle here is that over the course of the EU, at least three different systems have been named "Stenness System" by varying sources. The Essential Atlas attempted to untangle them into three distinct systems. They may actually only be two to be honest, but I'm doing my best to stick to the three that the Atlas has attempted to retcon. A number of pages here are an absolute mess in terms of referencing the correct "Stenness System". Any further questions, hit me up! I'm knee deep in sourcebooks at the moment. :) Celestial oubliette (talk) 05:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Heya, just to let you know that I have modified the third vote to codify the principle that we use the pronouns that people prefer if they are different at different times, after a discussion about it on the page itself and on Discord: Forum:CT:Pronouns usage. The voting options (alternate/use one set) stay the same, but feel free to change your votes as you like given the slight change. Cheers, OOM 224 18:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Hey, Fan! Just a heads up that your objections here have been addressed since the 9th. Would you be able to take a look at them? Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 02:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

I figured you might be interested in this SH thread: Forum:SH:SWTOR Loyalist/Saboteur Choices. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 20:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I added that section because the detrimentally influential fanon work Supernatural Encounters and it's supporters are adamantly conflating the Red Nebula and the Red Honeycomb Zone as one and the same. By clarifying facts such as these in the BTS we prevent fanon from that document creeping into canon articles. 185.114.33.4 03:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. I wanted to make sure you were advised that Anil added a 4th option to the Luke Skywalker image CT after you had voted, if you wanted to take a look. - JMAS 20:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok I dont know how many of the things you have changed that were mine but oopo rancisis was born before 270 BBY the lore points to it. Also, I dont know if you are trying to remove things from Tera Sinube he is over 400 years old and it is stated that in the High Republic Adventures (8). He was already over 46 in 382 BBY look at the notes and references.

"

Imperators II 19:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

You're a b1tch who thinks Grievous is "evil" when he's not. Canon facts that Grievous is a hero is not Fanon. GTFOH lil boyGeneralGrievousIsGood (talk) 06:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)