Hi and welcome to Wookieepedia! Please employ {{cite_web}} when citing websites. The template might seem a bit complex at first, so I've fixed this reference for you. Feel free to ask if you have any questions about using the template. Cheers, 1358 (Talk) 23:09, December 1, 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, it would be a vibro-knife because the blade is the size of a knife. A vibroblade would be larger, something like what the BX-series droid commandos wield. Kind regards Darth Tomotron (talk) 03:24, December 2, 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please be advised that all articles on in-universe topics are written in past tense. Please see the Manual of Style if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks!--Lewisr (talk) 17:31, December 7, 2019 (UTC)
"The Mandalorian, also known as Mando for short, is an alias..."This is not correct grammar. An alias cannot have an alias. Stop undoing my edit without even so much as an edit summary. --Potsk (talk) 01:42, December 16, 2019 (UTC)
Read and respond to your talk page. Otherwise this will keep going on until an admin blocks us both. --Potsk (talk) 03:40, December 16, 2019 (UTC)
I think that you have a point by saying it isn't correct grammar to say: ""The Mandalorian, also known as Mando for short, is an alias..." but the change you proposed makes the introductory sentence clunky and doesn't roll as smoothly as the original does. Christhewalrus () 03:52, December 16, 2019 (UTC)
Hello there
Hi there. Just to clear up the situation involving Din Djarin's skin tone, Pedro Pascal is of Chilean descent and his skin tone is dark enough to be considered "tan." He and Djarin are much closer in complexion to characters such as Poe Dameron and Bail Organa as opposed to Luke Skywalker and Armitage Hux, who are listed as "light." Thanks. RattsT (talk) 23:33, June 1, 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I believe that by default the view is set as oasis so anyone who hasn't specifically changed will see it that way. Its not a huge issue but I feel there's a better alternative than leaving a large section of whitespace which there now is, once the page is expanded a bit more I'm sure it won't be so worrying --Lewisr (talk) 02:28, July 8, 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. When adding maintenance templates to articles as you did here and here, it's beneficial to actually state which sections you're referring to, ideally on the articles' talk pages or at least in your edit summaries. This way other users will know where the issues lie, and the problems may be resolved. Thank you. RattsT (talk) 19:42, August 22, 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove messages from talk pages or other discussion pages. All messages are part of the public record and must remain visible. Thanks! DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for 1 day for breaking the Three-revert rule. Do not engage in edit wars, if there's any problems leave the user a message. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Once again, please stop adding the Clear template to articles. Its completely unnecessary and your edits just will continue to be reverted.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, we have a policy of having images from left to right and you continue to modify the alignment in both Jango Fett and Pyke Syndicate. When multiple users are reverting and telling you to stop is better to communicate with them rather than to engage in an edit war. I don't see any issues with the previous alignment, there's zero issues. Please reconsider your approach to editing and when multiple people are disagreeing with you communicate with them first before continuing to an edit war.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for 1 day for breaking the Three-revert rule. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Because your edits keep generating unnecessary blank space. The articles look okay, there's minor issues with the formatting that can be fixed by expanding articles or resizing some images.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Headers are allowed to be pushed over due to a left-aligned image. There is nothing wrong with that. There is no policy against it, and it cannot always be avoided. So just stop. You'd had numerous more experienced Wookieepedians - including Admins - advise you to stop what you are doing. So just STOP. - JMAS 07:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Stop removing images, or resizing thumbnails because they happen to push a heading over. It is not against policy. You have been told to stop by several users and admins. You have been blocked more than once for ignoring this. - JMAS 15:00, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hey Chris, just want to inform you that a lot of us on the Discord server and on the wiki are getting pretty exasperated with having to revert your edits. You haven't taken the advice of an administrator, DarthRuiz30, and quite a few users with edits numbering in the tens of thousands. This is an unofficial warning, but an official one is coming. Could be from me, we'll see how things progress. But one thing, please don't change the image placement. If an admin and 2 users have asked you to stop, please do. You've already been blocked for a day, don't make it a week. We just want everyone to be happy, and following the policies of the wiki. Have a great day, 20:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for 1 week for continuing to break the Three revert rule. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
As the use of the {{Clear}} template in the content namespace was banned at the most recent Mofference, attempting to mimic its functionality with HTML will also not be tolerated. Any further attempts to place any variation of in articles may result in a block. -- Darth Culator 23:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for 2 weeks for edit-warring, your fourth such block in the last two weeks. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You have been warned about this. You have been blocked multiple times for this. Stop. - JMAS 02:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, an administrator will block you from editing Wookieepedia. You have been told by multiple, more experienced Wookieepedians, including an administrator, that there is nothing wrong with an image pushing a header over. Just because you don't happen to like it, doesn't give you the right to continually remove content from pages. - JMAS 02:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chris. While the information you're removing from Carasynthia Dune isn't the most well written, outright deletion doesn't help anyone. If you're bothered by the quality of writing, you can always improve it yourself. In the meantime, there's no harm in leaving it as is. RattsT (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- That stuff ins't needed. It's unnecessarily inserted into the middle of the sentence and makes it less readable. The sentence is better off being kept short and concise. There is no good reason to just add all those details into that sentence when it doesn't need to be there. If someone wanted to read all that, they can just click the link and read the other article. An intro sentence to a paragraph doesn't need to be bogged down so so much extraneous info. The "harm" in leaving it how it is is that it decreases the readability of the article and makes a borderline run-on sentence. Christhewalrus () 03:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
It is not against any policy for an image to push a heading over. Period. There is no room for discussion here and you have been told directly by an admin that there is nothing wrong with it. It is however part of the layout guide that images should be placed to balance the article body. Regarding the Maul's double-bladed lightsaber page, there is nothing wrong with having the image in the Skirmish over Raydonia section, even if it is short and the image does push the next heading over. There are several short sections between the previous image and the next image that leave an non-aesthetically pleasing imageless gap if the image is not there. So I'm sorry if you don't happen to personally like it. Stop removing the image and expand the section if you are so bothered by it. - JMAS 02:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)