Should this be canon because most of the appearances and mentions are first time and there are more canon than legends? - Red Duel 21:28, March 31, 2019 (UTC)
I don't have the Sourcebook I might look to getting it but however. I'd like to know what page the character is referenced and what details are there about it. Like does it mention species Teemo is usually a Hutt and does it describe the character using he or she? I ask due to the Hutts in canon are two genders male and female. (User:SW-CanonDetailer01) (talk) SW-CanonDetailer01 14:20, September 27, 2020 (UTC)
This Talk page says that the book is Legends, but the article's main page clearly has a canon banner. I wanted to add a link for the character Bellows under Appearance/Characters/Canon because his name is there without a link, and then I wanted to unlink his name under Legends because he is a new character introduced in 2016. However, this policy and the discussion at the top of this Talk page have me confused. Red Heathen (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Should this be canon because most of the appearances and mentions are first time and there are more canon than legends? - Red Duel 21:28, March 31, 2019 (UTC)
- This is treated as Legends, since its mostly based on Legends. Per policy technically anything new introduced in FFG is Legends, newer FFG books are mostly based on canon, hence the reason of why they're treated more canon than 2016 FFG books--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:34, March 31, 2019 (UTC)
I don't have the Sourcebook I might look to getting it but however. I'd like to know what page the character is referenced and what details are there about it. Like does it mention species Teemo is usually a Hutt and does it describe the character using he or she? I ask due to the Hutts in canon are two genders male and female. (User:SW-CanonDetailer01) (talk) SW-CanonDetailer01 14:20, September 27, 2020 (UTC)